Master UPSC with Drishti's NCERT Course Learn More
This just in:

State PCS

Mains Practice Questions

  • Q. With growing emphasis on sustainable development, examine how intergenerational equity and environmental ethics influence public policy decisions. (150 words).

    09 Apr, 2026 GS Paper 4 Theoretical Questions

    Approach:

    • Introduce your answer by defining intergenerational equity and environmental ethics.
    • In the body, argue how intergenerational equity and environmental ethics influence public policy decisions.
    • Next, mention challenges in ensuring intergenerational equity and upholding environmental ethics.
    • Suggest measures.
    • Conclude accordingly.

    Introduction:

    The global discourse on sustainable development has transitioned from purely economic metrics to a "Value-Based" framework. This shift is centered on the understanding that the planet is not a legacy from our ancestors but a loan from our children.

    • Intergenerational Equity and Environmental Ethics now serve as the moral and legal anchors for public policy, ensuring that the "silent stakeholders" (future generations) have a seat at the decision-making table.

    Body

    Intergenerational Equity in Public Policy

    Intergenerational equity is the principle that every generation holds the Earth in common with all members of the species and has a right to the same quality of resources as their predecessors.

    • Resource Conservation: Policy shifts from "extraction" to "circularity." For example, India's Panchamrit pledge and Green Hydrogen Mission are designed to ensure that future generations are not left with depleted resources or a carbon-choked atmosphere.
    • Budgeting and Fiscal Responsibility: Modern policies like Green Bonds ensure that the financial burden of current development is not unfairly passed to the future, while creating assets that benefit them (e.g., renewable energy grids).
    • Legal Doctrine: The Public Trust Doctrine has been integrated into judicial reviews, where the state is seen as a "trustee" of natural resources rather than an "owner."

    Environmental Ethics as a Policy Driver

    Environmental ethics explores the moral relationship of human beings to the environment. It challenges the "Anthropocentric" (human-centered) view in favor of "Biocentrism."

    • Rights of Nature: Increasingly, policy is recognizing the intrinsic value of ecosystems. The recognition of Ecologically Sensitive Areas (ESAs) reflect an ethical commitment to non-human life.
    • Precautionary Principle: Public policy now operates on the basis that if an action has a risk of causing harm to the public or the environment, in the absence of scientific consensus, the burden of proof falls on those proposing the action.
    • Justice and Equity: Environmental ethics drives the "Polluter Pays Principle" and Common But Differentiated Responsibilities (CBDR), ensuring that those most responsible for environmental degradation bear the highest cost.

    Influence on Decision-Making Frameworks

    These principles have forced the evolution of standard administrative tools:

    Tool Traditional Approach Ethics-Driven Approach
    Cost-Benefit Analysis Focused on immediate GDP and ROI. Includes Natural Capital Accounting and social costs of carbon.
    EIA (Env. Impact Assessment) A "clearance" formality. A mandatory tool for "sustainable siting" and community consent.
    Urban Planning Expansion-oriented. Focus on "Sponge Cities" and "Net-Zero" buildings.

    Challenges in Ensuring Intergenerational Equity and Upholding Environmental Ethics:

    • The "Temporal Discounting" Bias: Human psychology and electoral cycles favor short-term rewards (jobs, cheap energy) over long-term stability.
      • Policymakers are often pressured to "borrow from the future" to satisfy the current electorate .
    • The Development-Environment Paradox: In developing nations, upholding strict environmental ethics can sometimes clash with the immediate ethical need to lift millions out of poverty (Intra-generational vs. Inter-generational equity) .
    • Lack of Global Enforcement: While ethical principles exist in treaties, there is often no "Global Environmental Police" to enforce intergenerational obligations, leading to a "Tragedy of the Commons" .

    Measures to Ensure Intergenerational Equity and Promote Environmental Ethics:

    • Institutionalizing "Natural Capital Accounting": Moving beyond GDP to include the Green GDP, where the depletion of natural resources is counted as a "Loss" in the national balance sheet, making ethical conservation a fiscal necessity.
    • Promoting "Circular Economy" Legalisations: Mandating "Right to Repair" and "Extended Producer Responsibility" (EPR) to ensure that the material footprint of the present does not become the toxic waste of the future.
    • Environmental Ethics in Education: Integrating Mission LiFE (Lifestyle for Environment) into school curricula to foster a generational shift in mindset from "Consumer" to "Custodian."

    Conclusion:

    Intergenerational equity and environmental ethics are the "conscience" of modern public policy. In the high-tech, high-growth era, these principles remind us that sustainability is a matter of justice, not just efficiency.

    To get PDF version, Please click on "Print PDF" button.

    Print PDF
close
Share Page
images-2
images-2