Master UPSC with Drishti's NCERT Course Learn More
This just in:

State PCS

Mains Practice Questions

  • Q. “Ethics in public administration goes beyond personal integrity to include institutional responsibility.” Discuss . (150 words).

    30 Jan, 2026 GS Paper 4 Theoretical Questions

    Approach:

    • Introduce your answer by highlighting the role of ethics in public administration .
    • In the body, argue why it must go beyond personal integrity .
    • Mention challenges in upholding institutional responsibility.
    • Suggest Measures to strengthen institutional responsibility.
    • Conclude accordingly.

    Introduction:

    Ethics in public administration is central to democratic governance, as it shapes how public power is exercised in pursuit of collective welfare.

    • While personal integrity of officials is essential, ethical governance cannot rely solely on individual morality.
    • It must be embedded in institutional responsibility, where systems, rules, and organisational cultures consistently promote ethical conduct and accountability.

    Body:

    Why Ethics Must Go Beyond Personal Integrity:

    • Continuity And Consistency in Governance: Personal integrity varies across individuals and tenures, whereas institutions provide continuity.
      • Ethical administration requires stable norms and procedures that ensure fairness regardless of who holds office.
      • For instance, transparent recruitment rules ensure merit-based selection even when individual discretion changes with leadership.
    • Limiting Discretion And Preventing Abuse Of Power: Institutions create checks and balances that constrain arbitrary action.
      • Ethical outcomes depend not only on good intentions but also on structured decision-making.
      • For example, e-procurement systems reduce scope for favouritism even if individual officials face external pressure.
    • Addressing Systemic And Collective Failures: Many ethical failures arise from systemic issues rather than individual misconduct.
      • Institutional responsibility helps identify and correct structural weaknesses.
      • For instance, repeated infrastructure failures point to institutional lapses in planning and oversight, not merely personal negligence.
    • Protecting Whistleblowers: Ethical individuals need institutional backing to act against wrongdoing. Without safeguards, personal integrity may be punished rather than rewarded.
      • Cases where whistleblowers faced retaliation highlight the need for strong institutional protection mechanisms.
    • Enhancing Public Trust And Legitimacy: Citizens trust institutions more than individuals. Ethical institutions build credibility through predictable, fair, and transparent processes.
      • For example, independent grievance redressal mechanisms enhance trust even when individual officials change.

    Challenges In Upholding Institutional Responsibility

    • Weak Enforcement Of Ethical Norms: Codes of conduct often exist on paper but lack effective enforcement and penalties. This reduces deterrence against unethical practices.
      • For example, delayed disciplinary proceedings weaken accountability and embolden misconduct.
    • Political Interference And Administrative Capture: Institutions may be compromised by political pressures, undermining ethical independence.
      • Frequent transfers or selective application of rules dilute institutional neutrality and responsibility.
    • Fragmented Accountability Structures: Overlapping jurisdictions and unclear responsibilities allow ethical lapses to go unaddressed.
      • In large welfare programmes, diffusion of responsibility across departments often obscures accountability.
    • Normalisation Of Unethical Practices: Over time, systemic tolerance of minor violations creates an ethical blind spot within institutions.
      • Routine procedural shortcuts gradually erode ethical standards and institutional culture.

    Measures To Strengthen Institutional Responsibility

    • Strengthening Ethical Frameworks And Codes: Clear, enforceable codes of conduct with defined consequences institutionalise ethical expectations and guide behaviour.
    • Enhancing Transparency And Process Automation: Digitisation, standard operating procedures, and open data reduce discretion and improve traceability of decisions.
    • Independent Oversight And Accountability Bodies: Autonomous vigilance, audit, and grievance institutions ensure impartial scrutiny and corrective action.
    • Building Ethical Institutional Culture: Regular ethics training, leadership by example, and internal dialogue help embed ethical values into organisational norms.

    Conclusion:

    Ethics in public administration cannot rest solely on the moral strength of individuals; it must be sustained through responsible institutions that guide, constrain, and correct behaviour. When systems reinforce ethical conduct, integrity becomes the norm rather than an exception.

    To get PDF version, Please click on "Print PDF" button.

    Print PDF
close
Share Page
images-2
images-2