- Filter By :
- Theoretical Questions
- Case Studies
-
Q. “Emotions are not obstacles to ethical reasoning; they are its raw material.” Examine the statement in the context of public service decision-making. (150 words)
04 Dec, 2025 GS Paper 4 Theoretical QuestionsApproach:
- Introduce the answer by briefing about reason and emotion in public service
- Delve into Emotions as the "Raw Material" of Ethical Reasoning
- Highlight Application in Public Service Decision-Making and in brief delve into the The Caveat: Raw Material vs. Finished Product
- Conclude suitably.
Introduction:
Traditionally, public administration has championed Weberian rationality, viewing emotions as biases that cloud judgment. However, the statement suggests a paradigm shift: emotions are not the enemy of reason but the foundation of morality.
- In public service, while reason dictates "how" to execute a task, emotion (specifically Emotional Intelligence) often dictates "why" that task matters.
Body:
Emotions as the "Raw Material" of Ethical Reasoning
- Signal for Moral Issues (The Radar): Emotions like empathy and compassion alert a civil servant to the suffering of others.
- Example: A District Collector (DC) might strictly follow land acquisition laws, but it is the emotion of empathy that helps them perceive the trauma of displacement, prompting them to ensure better rehabilitation than the bare minimum legal requirement.
- Moral Outrage as a Catalyst for Justice: Feelings of indignation or anger against injustice act as a fuel for rectitude.
- Example: It was the emotional response to the practice of Sati or Untouchability that drove reformers and later administrators to draft and enforce strict laws against them.
- The Conscience Keeper (Guilt and Pride): Anticipatory guilt prevents corruption. The fear of shame or the desire for self-respect (internal emotional states) often acts as a stronger deterrent against bribery than external vigilance.
Application in Public Service Decision-Making
When integrated with logic, emotions transform bureaucratic processes into "Good Governance."
- Humanizing the "Iron Cage" of Bureaucracy: Rules are often rigid. Emotions allow an officer to use discretionary powers for the public good (Spirit of the Law vs. Letter of the Law).
- Example: An elderly woman lacks one document for a pension scheme. A purely rational robot would reject her. An officer using emotions as "raw material" would recognize her desperation and find a procedural alternative to help her.
- Crisis Management: In disaster management, while logistical planning is rational, the urgency and care required to save lives stem from the emotional value placed on human life.
- Example: During the COVID-19 pandemic, officers who went beyond the call of duty were driven by solidarity and compassion, not just job descriptions.
- Gandhiji’s Talisman: Mahatma Gandhi’s advice to "recall the face of the poorest man" is essentially an appeal to use emotion (empathy) as a baseline for ethical reasoning (policy decision).
The Caveat: Raw Material vs. Finished Product
While emotions are the raw material, they cannot be the only factor. Raw material needs processing.
- Unchecked Emotion: Can lead to favoritism, nepotism, or knee-jerk reactions (e.g., awarding contracts based on friendship rather than merit).
- The Balance: As Aristotle pointed out, anyone can get angry, but to do so "at the right time, for the right purpose, and in the right way" is a virtue.
Conclusion
In conclusion, a civil servant without emotion is a robot, and one without reason is chaotic. Emotions provide the values (Justice, Compassion, Integrity), while reason provides the method. For a public servant, Emotional Intelligence is the refinery that processes the "raw material" of human emotion into the "finished product" of ethical public service.
To get PDF version, Please click on "Print PDF" button.
Print PDF