- Filter By :
- Theoretical Questions
- Case Studies
-
You are posted as the District Magistrate (DM) in a mineral-rich tribal district of central India. The district is home to significant reserves of iron ore, bauxite, and coal, making it a hub of mining activities. However, in recent years, illegal mining has become rampant, causing severe environmental degradation—forests are being cleared without permission, rivers are turning toxic due to slurry discharge, and agricultural land is becoming infertile.
Local communities, especially tribal groups, depend on forests and rivers for their livelihood. They are now losing access to clean water, forest produce, and fertile soil, creating discontent. Civil society organisations have documented cases where labourers, including women and even minors, are forced to work in unsafe conditions without proper safety gear. Frequent accidents, respiratory diseases, and lack of compensation for injuries have worsened the humanitarian crisis.
At the same time, mining activities bring employment and revenue to the region. Thousands of families depend on mining-related jobs, and shutting down operations abruptly could lead to unemployment and unrest. Local political leaders, some with direct business interests, exert pressure on you to adopt a “soft approach” towards the mining companies. Several lower-level officials in the mining and police departments are allegedly complicit, receiving bribes to overlook violations.
The judiciary, acting on petitions from NGOs, has now directed the district administration to submit a comprehensive plan to curb illegal mining. The media has been running campaigns questioning the administration’s inaction, putting your office under public scrutiny. However, taking strict action may invite political backlash, threats, and economic disruption.
A. Identify the major ethical issues involved in this case.
29 Aug, 2025 GS Paper 4 Case Studies
B. How would you balance economic interests, political pressures, and your duty towards environmental protection and labour welfare?
C. What measures would you take to ensure accountability and transparency in the administration to curb corruption in this case?
D. State the ethical values that should guide you. (250 words)Approach :
- Briefly describe the situation to establish context.
- Identify and discuss the ethical issues involved.
- Suggest steps to balance economic interests, political pressures, and environmental duty.
- Highlight mechanisms to ensure accountability and transparency.
- Suggest sustainable measures for mining governance.
- State guiding ethical values.
- Conclude with a value-based closure.
Introduction:
As District Magistrate of a mineral-rich tribal district, I face an ethical dilemma between safeguarding the environment and livelihoods versus yielding to political and institutional pressures. The challenge lies in balancing ecological sustainability, social justice, and economic needs while upholding rule of law and administrative integrity.
Body :
A. Ethical Issues Involved
- Conflict between Development and Environmental ethics: Rampant deforestation, river pollution, and soil degradation violating principles of sustainability and intergenerational equity.
- Human rights Violations of the Miners: Unsafe working conditions, child labour, lack of compensation, and exploitation of vulnerable tribal groups.
- Integrity vs. Corruption: Officials’ collusion with miners through bribery undermining rule of law.
- Political Pressure vs. Neutrality: Pressure from leaders to adopt a “soft approach,” testing administrative objectivity.
- Ensuring Public Trust: Media scrutiny and NGO petitions demand transparency and responsiveness from administration.
B. Balancing Economic Interests, Political Pressures, and Duties
- Phased Enforcement for Fair Economic Transition: Regularise legal mining while gradually curbing illegal practices to prevent sudden unemployment, demonstrating prudence and fairness.
- Generating Alternative Livelihoods: Skill development programs, MGNREGA works, and eco-tourism initiatives reduce reliance on illegal mining, promoting distributive justice, economic rights, and human dignity of vulnerable communities.
- Ethical Political Navigation and Stakeholder Awareness: Present data on health and ecological costs to convince stakeholders; frame strict regulation as a long-term governance success.
- Inclusive Community Participation and Procedural Justice: Involving tribal councils, NGOs, and local communities in decision-making upholds participatory governance, fairness, and trust, ensuring legitimacy and respect for the rights of affected groups.
C. Ensuring Accountability & Transparency
- Digital Monitoring: Use of technology like GPS-enabled transport permits, installing CCTV at mining sites, and drone surveillance to curb malpractices.
- Independent Audits: Periodic third-party inspections of mining operations and labour conditions to ensure fairness and objectivity.
- Public reporting: Creating an online dashboard listing mining leases, violations, and penalties for grievance redressal.
- Anti-corruption mechanisms: Providing Whistle-blower protection, ensuring strict departmental inquiries, and rotation of compromised officials to curb corruption.
D. Ethical Values to Guide Action:
- Integrity: Resisting corruption and undue influence.
- Justice: Protecting tribal rights and ensuring fair compensation.
- Environmental stewardship: Preserving forests, water, and soil.
- Empathy: Safeguarding vulnerable communities and labourers.
- Courage: Taking tough decisions despite political pressure.
- Accountability: Transparent decision-making to build public trust.
Conclusion:
As Mahatma Gandhi said, “The Earth provides enough to satisfy every man’s need, but not every man’s greed.” Tackling illegal mining is thus an ethical necessity to balance development with sustainability, protect tribal livelihoods, and uphold justice for future generations.
To get PDF version, Please click on "Print PDF" button.
Print PDF
