Mains Practice Questions

Introduction:

The situation presents a complex ethical challenge where caste-based discrimination undermines both children's education and social harmony. The Sarpanch faces the dilemma of upholding the constitutional values of equality and justice while ensuring the smooth functioning of the education system. Resolving this conflict requires a pragmatic approach that promotes inclusivity without compromising the rights of any group.

Body:

1. What are the ethical dilemmas faced by Sarpanch?

• Constitutional Morality vs. Social Prejudices: The situation presents a conflict between the constitutional mandate to abolish untouchability under Article 17 and the prevailing caste prejudices within the community. It reflects the deeper issue of social exclusion rooted in tradition.
• Educational Access vs. Social Harmony: Enforcing the midday meal scheme risks alienating a section of the community, potentially escalating tensions and further reducing school attendance
  • The dilemma lies in choosing between upholding the right of the cook to serve, versus satisfying the social pressure from the parents who oppose the cook based on caste.
• Short-Term Compliance vs. Long-Term Impact: The Sarpanch has to decide between implementing short-term measures (such as appeasing the parents) to ensure school attendance, or taking a firm stand for long-term social justice, which may create temporary unrest but strengthen the community's future social cohesion.

2. What steps can the Sarpanch take to resolve the caste-based conflict and restore school attendance?

• Sensitize the Parents: The Sarpanch can organize community meetings (Gram Sabha) to educate parents about the detrimental impact of caste-based discrimination and the legal rights of individuals from SC communities.
  • Using local community leaders to appeal for unity and social justice can help reduce prejudice.
• Highlighting Legal Rights: Raising awareness about the constitutional provisions (Art 14, 15, 17) and government schemes designed to uplift marginalized communities can encourage support for the cook and reduce caste-based biases.
• Engage with the Cook: The Sarpanch should ensure that the new cook is supported professionally and personally, reiterating the importance of their role in the school’s operations.
  • The Sarpanch can build community trust by publicly affirming the cook’s qualifications and compliance with government norms, while addressing concerns through regular food quality checks and monitoring.
• Take Firm Action if Required: If caste-based exclusion persists, the Sarpanch must uphold constitutional values by ensuring the school functions without discrimination.
  • This may require taking a firm stand, including escalating the matter to higher authorities like the District Education Officer.
• Grievance Redressal Committee: Set up a panel comprising parents, teachers, and marginalised sections representatives to address concerns transparently.

3. How can different stakeholders support inclusive practices in public services?

• Local Government (Panchayat): The Panchayat can play a pivotal role in addressing caste-based exclusion by setting a precedent for social justice within the village.
  • It can also work with local authorities to ensure that the educational scheme continues without interference from caste biases.
• School Administration: The school administration and teachers must support inclusive practices by ensuring that all students, regardless of caste, have equal access to education and government-provided resources like the midday meal scheme.
  • Teachers can foster inclusivity by creating an environment where students are encouraged to accept diversity.
• Government Authorities: The Education Department such as district education officers can ensure that the midday meal scheme is implemented as intended, with regular monitoring of school operations to ensure no caste-based discrimination takes place.
• Community Leaders: These leaders can serve as influential voices to promote social harmony, emphasizing the importance of caste equality and the value of government welfare schemes. Their support can go a long way in changing community attitudes and reducing caste-based exclusion.

Conclusion:

The Sarpanch’s strategy should prioritize systemic change over quick fixes. By combining grassroots engagement, institutional reforms, and stakeholder collaboration, the village can dismantle caste barriers while safeguarding education. This approach aligns with constitutional values and ensures sustainable social harmony.