Total Questions : 1
-
Case Study
Rakesh Mehta is the Executive Engineer in the Public Works Department (PWD) of a rapidly developing district. His department is responsible for awarding contracts for road construction, public buildings, and infrastructure maintenance. Recently, the government sanctioned a major road development project aimed at improving connectivity in rural areas.
During the tendering process, Rakesh notices that the bidding conditions have been subtly modified to favour a particular private contractor. The technical eligibility criteria appear unnecessarily restrictive, effectively eliminating genuine competitors. Informally, Rakesh learns that senior officials and local political leaders are pressuring the department to ensure the contract goes to this preferred bidder in exchange for financial kickbacks and political funding.
Although the selected firm quotes a higher price and has a questionable track record, the tender evaluation committee is being influenced to overlook these issues. When Rakesh raises procedural concerns, he is advised by colleagues to “go with the system” and reminded that officers who previously opposed such practices were sidelined or transferred.
Meanwhile, local citizens and media have started raising concerns about poor quality of public works and rising costs in government projects. Rakesh now faces a moral dilemma—whether to remain silent and protect his career or uphold transparency and fairness at the risk of professional retaliation.
Questions
Q1.Identify the ethical issues involved in the above case.
Q2.What ethical dilemmas does Rakesh Mehta face as a public servant while dealing with political pressure and irregularities in the tendering process?
Q3.What should be the most appropriate course of action for Rakesh to ensure transparency, accountability, and public interest in the tendering process?
GS Paper 4 Case Studies
