The New Nuclear Frontier in Space

• 04 Dec 2025

For Prelims: Lunar Fission Surface Power Project, Small Nuclear Reactor, Voyager Spacecraft, Mars, Methane, Radioactive Materials, Outer Space Treaty, UN Committee on the Peaceful Uses of Outer Space (COPUOS), IAEA, 1972 Liability Convention.      

For Mains: Various Nuclear Technologies for Space, their need, associated challenges and legal framework to govern them, Steps Needed to Secure a Responsible Nuclear Future in Space. 

Source: TH 

Why in News?

The United States has announced an ambitious plan under its Lunar Fission Surface Power Project to deploy a small nuclear reactor on the Moon by the early 2030s.  

• This initiative is part of NASA's Artemis Base Camp strategy and marks the beginning of large-scale use of nuclear energy for off-Earth habitats. If executed, it will become the first permanent nuclear power source beyond Earth orbit, 

How do Nuclear Technologies Shape the Future of Space Exploration? 

• Evolving Radioisotope Thermoelectric Generators (RTGs): They convert heat from decaying plutonium-238 into electricity but produce only a few hundred watts—enough for instruments, not for human bases. It is currently in use (e.g., on Voyager spacecraft).  
• Compact Fission Reactors: About the size of a shipping container, they can generate 10 to 100 kilowatts, capable of powering habitats and initial industrial units. 
• Nuclear Thermal Propulsion (NTP): Nuclear Thermal Propulsion (like the US DRACO programme, testing by 2026) heats propellant for thrust, potentially shortening Mars trips by months.  
• Nuclear Electric Propulsion (NEP): It uses reactor electricity to ionise propellant and provides years of stable, efficient thrust, ideal for deep-space probes and cargo transport. 

Why is Nuclear Power Needed for Space-based Operations? 

• Solar Limitations: A lunar night lasts about 14 Earth days, with temperatures dropping below –170°C, making solar power unreliable due to the need for massive battery arrays.  
  • On Mars, month-long dust storms reduce solar efficiency. NASA's developing KRUSTY system can provide up to 10 kilowatts of steady, reliable power. 
• Reliability Problem: Human outposts must operate 24/7/365, requiring reliable power for life support, habitat heating, communication, and science & industry tasks like fuel production and manufacturing. 
  •  A nuclear reactor offers a constant, predictable base-load power supply, unaffected by sunlight or weather. 
• Location Flexibility Problem: With nuclear power, missions can operate anywhere, including permanently shadowed craters with water ice, explore diverse regions beyond sun-rich zones, and establish bases or robotic stations across the planet without dependence on sunlight. 
• Scalability Problem: A small crew could manage with solar plus batteries, but larger crews, in-situ resource utilization (ISRU) plants, agriculture, and industrial projects require megawatt-level power. Only nuclear fission is a proven technology capable of scaling to meet these high energy demands in extraterrestrial environments. 
• Mission Architecture Problem: Many Mars mission plans require fuel production on the surface, but processes like splitting water ice and reacting gases to make methane are highly energy-intensive. A reliable nuclear reactor can power this “gas station on Mars,” making missions safer and reducing fuel launched from Earth.

Current Legal Framework for Nuclear Power Use in Space 

• Outer Space Treaty (OST) 1967: Article IV of the Outer Space Treaty (OST) 1967 bans countries from putting nuclear weapons or any weapons of mass destruction in Earth orbit, on the Moon, or anywhere in outer space. 
  • However, it allows the use of nuclear-powered equipment for peaceful space exploration. 
• Principles Relevant to the Use of Nuclear Power Sources in Outer Space 1992: Adopted in 1992, the UN treaty ensures safe nuclear power use in space, requiring public safety assessments. Radioisotope generators may be used for interplanetary missions or stored in high Earth orbit after use, with proper disposal mandated.

What are the Legal and Environmental Challenges in Using Nuclear Power in Space? 

• Irreversible Environmental Contamination: A reactor malfunction could cause permanent pollution of pristine extraterrestrial environments like the Moon or Mars, spreading radioactive materials that destroy unique scientific records of solar system history and compromise future habitability. 
• The Safety Zone Dilemma: While logical for safety, establishing exclusion zones around nuclear sites creates a legal conflict. Unregulated zones could allow a single nation de facto control over resource-rich areas, violating the Outer Space Treaty’s prohibition on national appropriation and blocking access for others. 
• Escalation to International Conflict: A nuclear incident in space has transboundary consequences—such as radioactive debris or perceived weaponization—that could damage diplomatic trust, trigger accusations, and lead to retaliatory measures, turning exploration cooperation into suspicion and conflict. 
• Unregulated and Risky Testing: Without universally accepted safety standards, states or private entities may conduct experimental tests of powerful reactors or propulsion systems, leading to a “race to the bottom” in safety protocols and increasing the probability of accidents that endanger all spacefaring nations. 

What can be done to Lead a Responsible Space Nuclear Framework? 

• Strengthen the Core Legal Framework: The UN Committee on the Peaceful Uses of Outer Space (COPUOS) must modernize the 1992 Principles to expand scope to include nuclear thermal and electric propulsion and establish binding safety standards for design, operational safety, fuel integrity, and end-of-life disposal. 
• Multilateral Oversight and Transparency: Form an International Technical Advisory Body (e.g., an International Space Nuclear Safety Group similar to the IAEA) to certify designs, verify compliance with safety protocols, for all nuclear systems in space. 
• Specific Protocols for Critical Scenarios: Establish rules for temporary, non-discriminatory safety perimeters on celestial bodies that prevent sovereignty claims. Update 1972 Liability Convention for nuclear incidents in space with a clear responsibility and emergency response protocols for transboundary accidents. 
• Foster Pre-emptive Norm-Setting: Major space powers like the US, Russia, China, and emerging actors like India should lead negotiations, showing that safety is a shared priority.  
  • Involve commercial space companies in rule-making to ensure regulatory certainty for key users. 
• Ethical and Legal Standards: Ensure technological advancements are guided by coherent legal and ethical frameworks to prevent accidents with long-lasting environmental or geopolitical consequences. 

Conclusion 

The deployment of nuclear reactors in space promises reliable, scalable power for lunar and Martian missions, enabling life support, industrial operations, and propulsion technologies. However, without robust legal frameworks and multilateral oversight, the risks of contamination, conflict, and unsafe testing could undermine space exploration, making international cooperation and regulation essential. 

Drishti Mains Question:

Q. Discuss the strategic and technological significance of deploying nuclear fission reactors on the Moon. What are the associated environmental and legal challenges?

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) 

Q. What is the Lunar Fission Surface Power Project?
A US initiative to deploy a small nuclear reactor on the Moon by the early 2030s to provide continuous, reliable power for lunar operations. 

Q. What are the main types of nuclear technology used in space? 
RTGs for low-power instruments, Compact Fission Reactors for habitats, Nuclear Thermal Propulsion (NTP), and Nuclear Electric Propulsion (NEP) for spacecraft thrust. 

Q. What are the key legal guidelines for using nuclear power in space? 
The 1992 UN Principles and the Outer Space Treaty permit peaceful nuclear use but lack binding safety standards for modern systems like propulsion reactors. 

Summary 

• Solar power is insufficient for sustained lunar/Martian operations, necessitating compact fission reactors for reliable, scalable energy. 
• The 1967 Outer Space Treaty allows nuclear power but the law is outdated, lacking binding safety standards, liability rules, and accident protocols. 
• Major risks are radioactive contamination, territorial "safety zones," and international conflict from an incident. 
• Urgent international governance is needed to create binding rules, a global oversight body, and clear safety zones. 

UPSC Civil Services Examination, Previous Year Question (PYQ) 

Prelims 

Q. In India, why are some nuclear reactors kept under “IAEA safeguards” while others are not? (2020)

(a) Some use uranium and others use thorium    

(b) Some use imported uranium and others use domestic supplies    

(c) Some are operated by foreign enterprises and others are operated by domestic enterprises    

(d) Some are State-owned and others are privately owned    

Ans: (b)

Q. Consider the following statements: (2017)

1. The Nuclear Security Summits are periodically held under the aegis of the United Nations.    
2. The International Panel on Fissile Materials is an organ of the International Atomic Energy Agency.    

Which of the statements given above is/are correct?    

(a) 1 only    

(b) 2 only    

(c) Both 1 and 2    

(d) Neither 1 nor 2    

Ans: (d)

---

Mains

Q. With growing energy needs should India keep on expanding its nuclear energy programme? Discuss the facts and fears associated with nuclear energy. (2018)

Q. Give an account of the growth and development of nuclear science and technology in India. What is the advantage of the fast breeder reactor programme in India? (2017)