Custodial Torture and Ethical Concerns
- 27 Jun 2023
- 7 min read
Why in News?
Recently, the Delhi High Court has upheld the conviction and 10-year sentence (awarded in 2019) of five Uttar Pradesh policemen for Custodial Torture of a 26-year-old man causing his death in 2006.
What is Custodial Torture?
- Types of Custodial Death:
- Death in Police Custody: Can result from excessive force, torture, denial of medical care, or other forms of abuse.
- Death in Judicial Custody: May occur due to overcrowding, poor hygiene, lack of medical facilities, inmate violence, or suicide.
- Death in the Custody of Army or Paramilitary Forces: Can happen through torture, extrajudicial killings, encounters, or crossfire incidents.
Constitutional Provisions Related to Custodial Torture:
- Article 21 of the Constitution of India guarantees the right to life and personal liberty, which includes the right to be free from torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.
- Article 20(1) states that no person shall be convicted of any offence, except those which are in contravention of the law in power at the commission of the Act.
- Article 20(3) prohibits a person to be compelled to be a witness against himself. It is an extremely instrumental law as it protects the accused from giving confessions when the accused is coerced or tortured to do so.
- Related International Conventions:
- International Human Rights Law, 1948 contains a provision which protects people from torture and other enforced disappearances.
- The United Nation Charter, 1945 also (clearly) calls for treating prisoners with dignity.
- The Nelson Mandela Rules, 2015 were adopted by the UNGA to treat prisoners with inherent dignity and to prohibit torture and other ill-treatment.
What are the Ethical Arguments against Custodial Torture?
- Violates Human Rights and Dignity:
- Every individual possesses inherent dignity and should be treated with respect and fairness. Custodial violence violates this fundamental principle by subjecting individuals to physical and psychological harm, stripping them of their dignity, and denying them the basic Human Rights.
- Undermines Rule of Law:
- Custodial violence undermines the principles of the rule of law and due process.
- Law enforcement officers have a duty to uphold and enforce the law, but engaging in violence contradicts the very principles they are meant to uphold - justice, equality, and protection of human rights.
- Presumption of Guilty:
- Custodial torture undermines the principle of "innocent until proven guilty”. Torturing individuals before they have been convicted of a crime violates their right to a fair trial and due process.
- It is the responsibility of the justice system to determine guilt or innocence, not to inflict punishment through torture.
- Against Professionalism and Integrity:
- Police officers and authorities are expected to adhere to high ethical standards, including professionalism, integrity, and respect for human rights.
- Custodial violence violates these ethical principles and tarnishes the reputation of the profession as a whole.
- Targets Vulnerable Individuals:
- Custodial violence often targets individuals who are already vulnerable, such as suspects, detainees, or prisoners. This includes marginalised populations, minorities, or those lacking social power.
- Ethically, it is crucial to protect and support the rights of these vulnerable individuals rather than subjecting them to further harm.
- Betrays Legal and Moral Responsibility:
- Law enforcement officers and authorities have a legal and moral responsibility to protect the welfare and rights of those under their custody. Engaging in violence or abuse represents a betrayal of this responsibility and a violation of the ethical obligations inherent in their roles.
- Strengthening legal systems involves enacting comprehensive legislation that explicitly criminalizes custodial torture, ensuring prompt and impartial investigations, these measures can be taken to combat custodial torture.
- Police reforms should focus on training programs that emphasise protection of human rights besides maintaining professionalism and instilling empathy.
- Oversight mechanisms should be established to monitor and address such cases effectively.
- Civil society and human rights organizations should advocate for victims, provide support and legal assistance, and collaborate with international bodies for redress and justice.