हिंदी साहित्य: पेन ड्राइव कोर्स
This just in:

International Relations

At UNGA, India Calls for Early Adoption of CCIT

  • 01 Oct 2018
  • 4 min read

External Affairs Minister Sushma Swaraj reiterated India’s demand for a Comprehensive Convention on International Terrorism (CCIT) at the 73rd session of UN General Assembly.

About CCIT

  • In 1996, with the objective of providing a comprehensible legal framework to counter terrorism, India proposed to the United Nations General Assembly (UNGA) the adoption of the "Comprehensive Convention on International Terrorism” (CCIT).
  • India, which has been a victim of cross-border terrorism, took cognizance of the threat it poses to international peace and security long before the major world powers.
  • CCIT included the following major objectives:
    • To have a universal definition of terrorism that all 193-members of the UNGA will adopt into their own criminal law.
    • To ban all terror groups and shut down terror camps.
    • To prosecute all terrorists under special laws.
    • To make cross-border terrorism an extraditable offense worldwide.
  • Definition of terrorism:
    • According to this convention, Any person who commits an offense, with the purpose of the conduct is to intimidate a population or to compel a Government or an international organization to do or abstain from doing any act, which causes:
      • Death or serious bodily injury to any person; or
      • Serious damage to public or private property, including a place of public use, a State or government facility, a public transportation system, an infrastructure facility or the environment; or
      • Damage to property, places, facilities, or systems resulting in or likely to result in a major economic loss,

Issues surrounding CCIT

  • The conclusion and ratification of the CCIT remains deadlocked due to opposition from three main blocs –
  • The US
    • The US wanted the draft to exclude acts committed by military forces of states during peacetime.
    • The U.S. has been worried about the application of the CCIT to its own military forces especially with regard to interventions in Afghanistan and Iraq. 
  • The Organization of Islamic Countries (OIC)
    • OIC wants exclusion of national liberation movements, especially in the context of Israel-Palestinian conflict.
    • It was argued that there is a need to distinguish acts of terrorism from movements for self-determination so that legitimate movements are not labeled as criminal acts of terrorism.
  • The Latin American countries.
    • Latin American countries wanted the draft to cover “state terrorism” and also the violation of International Human Rights laws by states.
  • Currently, the negotiations of the Comprehensive Terrorism Convention are deadlocked because of differences over the definition of terrorism.
  • This definition itself is not controversial.  The deadlock is because of issue that whether such definition would be applicable to the armed forces of a state and to Self- determination movements.

Conclusion

    • To create an effective mechanism to counter terrorism it is necessary that countries should agree upon a definition of terrorism. Countries should not look from the prism of their self-interest rather look into the issue through a broader perspective of solving the problem of global terrorism.
    SMS Alerts
     

    Please login or register to view note list

    close

    Please login or register to list article as bookmarked

    close
     

    Please login or register to make your note

    close

    Please login or register to list article as progressed

    close

    Please login or register to list article as bookmarked

    close