Study Material | Test Series
Drishti IAS
call1800-121-6260 / 011-47532596
Drishti The Vision Foundation
(A unit of VDK Eduventures Pvt. Ltd.)
prelims Test Series 2019
सेमिनार: अंग्रेज़ी सीखने का अवसर (23 सितंबर: दोपहर 3 बजे)
Supreme Court Called to Scrap Quota in Higher Education
Nov 04, 2015

The Supreme Court called for the end of the reservation system in all institutions of higher education, regretting that ‘some privilege remains unchanged’ 68 years after Independence. It urged the government to take steps to remove reservations in National Interest.

A bench of Justices Dipak Misra and P.C. Pant noted that despite several reminders to the central and state governments to make merit the primary criteria for admissions into super-specialty courses, the ground reality remains that reservation often holds sway over merit.

  • The bench remarked, “The said privilege remains unchanged, as if it is to compete with eternity, it concurs completely with what the Supreme Court had ruled in 1988 in two judgments.

In these two cases, while dealing with the issue of reservation in super-specialty courses in medical institutions, the top court had said, “There should really be no reservation since it is in the general interest of the country for improving the standard of higher education, and thereby improving the quality of available medical services to the people of India. We hope and trust that the Government of India and the state governments shall seriously consider this aspect of the matter without delay and appropriate guidelines shall be evolve.” 

  • Emphasising what the apex court held 27 years ago, the bench said it is now ‘inclined’ to convey the same message to the central and state governments over reservation in institutions of higher education.

  • The court said, “Therefore, we echo the same feeling and reiterate the aspirations of others so that authorities can objectively assess and approach the situation so that the national interest can become paramount.” 

  • It also referred to a body of judgments, asking government authorities to abstain from relaxing the eligibility criteria basing it on various kinds of reservation since it would defeat the very object of imparting the best possible training to selected meritorious candidates.

The bench made these observations as it delivered its judgment on a batch of petitions, which had challenged an eligibility criteria for admissions into certain super-specialty medical courses in Andhra Pradesh, Telangana and Tamil Nadu. They allowed only those having domicile in the three states to appear for the examination, thereby making the seats reserved only for such candidates, based on residence.

  • The bench said it cannot interfere with the admission process in Andhra Pradesh and Telangana since a Presidential Order has created an exception and the constitutionality of this Order had not been challenged. But it agreed to examine on November 4 whether Tamil Nadu could do the same and allow this form of reservation in a post-graduate programme.

  • Even as it expressed its inability to adjudicate the constitutionality of the special privilege granted to Andhra Pradesh and Telangana under Article 371-D of the Constitution and the Presidential Order, the bench observed that such privileges ought to be reconsidered by the governments and steps be taken.

Helpline Number : 87501 87501
To Subscribe Newsletter and Get Updates.