Master UPSC with Drishti's NCERT Course Learn More
This just in:

State PCS

Mains Practice Questions

  • Q. “In an era marked by shifting geopolitical alignments and the rise of minilateral groupings, examine the relevance of multilateralism in India’s foreign policy. How can India leverage multilateral platforms to advance its strategic autonomy and global leadership ambitions?” (250 words)

    28 Apr, 2026 GS Paper 2 International Relations

    Approach:

    • Introduction of the answer by briefing about the paradox faced by Multilateralism
    • Delve into the Relevance of Multilateralism in India’s Foreign Policy
    • Highlight the Challenges Hindering Multilateral Effectiveness
    • Delve into how India can Leverage Platforms for Strategic Autonomy and Leadership
    • Conclude suitably.

    Introduction:

    In the contemporary global order, multilateralism is facing a paradox: while "borderless crises" like climate change and AI disruption demand collective action, the traditional institutions designed to manage them are paralyzed by great power rivalry.

    • For India, a rising power and the "voice of the Global South," multilateralism is not just a diplomatic choice but a strategic necessity to ensure a rules-based, multipolar world.

    Body:

    Relevance of Multilateralism in India’s Foreign Policy

    Despite the rise of minilateralism (like QUAD or I2U2), universal multilateral platforms remain relevant for India for several reasons:

    • Management of Global Commons: Issues like Outer Space (Kessler Syndrome prevention) and the Global Digital Commons cannot be managed by small groups. India relies on multilateral legal scaffolding (like the 1967 Outer Space Treaty) to prevent weaponization and ensure equitable access.
    • Climate & Environment: Multilateralism institutionalizes "Equitable Burden Sharing" between the Global North and South.
      • The Paris Agreement and the Cali Fund (for biodiversity) provide the frameworks through which India can demand climate finance and technology transfer.
    • Global Public Health: Transnational health security requires synchronized biological containment.
      • India’s "Pharmacy of the World" status is most effective when channeled through multilateral pipelines like the WHO-led COVAX facility.
    • Macroeconomic Stability: Interconnected financial architectures require institutions like the IMF and World Bank to act as shock absorbers against synchronized global recessions and sovereign debt crises.

    Challenges Hindering Multilateral Effectiveness

    The current system is strained by what many call a "Legitimacy Crisis":

    • Institutional Paralysis: The UNSC veto gridlock (with a peak of 7 vetoes in 2024) has rendered the council reactive rather than preventative in conflicts like the Russia-Ukraine war.
    • Representation Gap: The "Bretton Woods" institutions reflect a 1945 power structure. For example, the US holds 16.49% voting power in the IMF, giving it effective veto power despite having only 4.22% of the global population.
    • The "Donor Squeeze": A pivot toward domestic populism has seen a 15% drop in contributions to the multilateral development system, leading to a "do less with less" reality.
    • Regulatory Fragmentation: The lack of a global AI treaty has resulted in three non-interoperable regimes (US, EU, China), leading to a "Splinternet" governed by national security rather than global standards.

    Leveraging Platforms for Strategic Autonomy and Leadership

    India can leverage its unique position as a "Vishwa Bandhu" (friend to the world) to advance its global ambitions:

    • Championing "Reformed Multilateralism": India leverages its democratic legitimacy to push for a "Heptagonal" power model in the UNSC.
      • By integrating the African Union into the G20, India has already demonstrated its ability to pivot multilateralism from an elite club to an inclusive platform, cementing its leadership of the Global South.
    • Setting Norms for Digital Public Infrastructure (DPI): India is advancing its strategic autonomy by exporting the "India Stack" (UPI, Aadhaar).
      • This offers a multilateral alternative to the "Big Tech" monopolies of the West and the "Closed Net" model of the East, positioning India as a leader in "human-centric" digital governance.
    • Transitioning from "Rule-Taker" to "Rule-Maker": Through initiatives like the International Solar Alliance (ISA) and the Global Biofuels Alliance, India is creating action-oriented bodies that bypass traditional bureaucratic bottlenecks.
      • These "issue-based coalitions" allow India to lead the green transition on its own terms.
    • Acting as a "Consensus Builder": India’s Strategic Autonomy allows it to talk to all sides, from the Quad to BRICS.
      • It uses minilateralism (like I2U2) not as a replacement for the UN, but as a functional supplement to deliver results in maritime security and supply chain resilience.

    Conclusion:

    Multilateralism is at a crossroads. While the rise of plurilateral blocs suggests fragmentation, the borderless nature of modern threats makes universal cooperation unavoidable. India, by aligning global governance with contemporary realities and serving as a bridge between the North and South, can evolve from a stakeholder in the old system to a primary architect of its reinvention.

    To get PDF version, Please click on "Print PDF" button.

    Print PDF
close
Share Page
images-2
images-2