Q. What is Marine Cloud Brightening? Discuss its potential benefits and risks in the context of mitigating climate change. (250 words)

20 May, 2024 GS Paper 1 Geography

Approach

  • Introduce by defining Marine Cloud Brightening
  • Delve into potential benefits of MCB
  • Highlight significant risks associated with it
  • Conclude positively.

Introduction

Marine Cloud Brightening (MCB) is a proposed geoengineering technique that aims to mitigate the effects of climate change by increasing the reflectivity of low-level marine clouds, thereby reflecting more incoming sunlight back into space and reducing the amount of solar radiation absorbed by the Earth's surface.

  • The process involves spraying a fine mist of seawater particles into the atmosphere, which act as cloud condensation nuclei and promote the formation of brighter, more reflective clouds.
  • These clouds have a higher albedo (reflectivity) and can reflect more incoming sunlight, potentially cooling the Earth's surface.

Body

Potential Benefits:

  • Cooling Effect: MCB has the potential to reduce global temperatures by reflecting more sunlight back into space, potentially mitigating the effects of climate change caused by greenhouse gas emissions.
    • MCB could lessen extreme ocean heat, potentially safeguarding marine ecosystems like coral reefs facing bleaching threats.
  • Buying Time for Emissions Cuts: MCB could provide a buffer while we transition to cleaner energy sources.
    • This buying time could allow for deeper cuts in emissions and avoid reaching catastrophic tipping points, like the irreversible melting of polar ice caps.
  • Localized Impact: Unlike other geoengineering techniques that aim to achieve global cooling, MCB can be targeted to specific regions, allowing for more localized climate interventions.
    • For example, MCB could be deployed in areas particularly vulnerable to rising sea levels or extreme heat events.
  • Reversibility: The effects of MCB are relatively short-lived, and if stopped, the Earth's climate would return to its previous state within a few years, making it a potentially reversible technique.
  • Cost-effectiveness: Compared to other geoengineering techniques, MCB is considered relatively inexpensive and technologically feasible.

Potential Risks:

  • Unintended Consequences: Like any large-scale intervention in the Earth's climate system, MCB carries the risk of unintended consequences that are difficult to predict, such as changes in precipitation patterns, ocean circulation, and ecosystem disruptions.
  • Limited Scope: MCB might not be effective in all regions. Cloud types and atmospheric conditions can significantly impact its effectiveness.
    • Deploying MCB in the tropics, where clouds are already quite reflective, would likely have minimal impact on global warming.
  • Spatial Variability: The cooling effects of MCB may not be evenly distributed, leading to regional disparities and potential conflicts over resource allocation and deployment.
  • Moral Hazard: The perceived effectiveness of MCB could potentially reduce the urgency to address the root causes of climate change, such as reducing greenhouse gas emissions.
  • International Governance: Deploying MCB unilaterally could trigger international disputes. Effective international agreements would be necessary for responsible implementation.

Conclusion

While MCB holds promise as a potential climate change mitigation strategy, its deployment on a large scale would require careful consideration of the risks, as well as robust governance frameworks and international cooperation to ensure responsible implementation and monitoring.