Day 51: How far Jinnah was responsible for the partition of India. Discuss. (250 Words)
30 Aug 2022 | GS Paper 1 | HistoryThe unity of the Indian people allowed them to attain their freedom. Mohammad Ali Jinnah, Mahatma Gandhi, Jawaharlal Nehru, and other notable leaders of the Independence movement. Despite having such a strong sense of oneness, it is difficult to pinpoint what went wrong when India was split into Hindustan and Pakistan. The division of India and Pakistan is credited mostly to Mohammad Ali Jinnah.
Jinnah entered politics for the first time in India in 1906. He initially went to an Indian National Congress meeting while serving as Dadabhai Naoroji's secretary. In 1906, the All-India Muslim League was founded. Jinnah was uninterested in the idea of separate electorates that Morley Minto offered to Muslims in 1909. Jinnah joined the Muslim League in 1913.
Jinnah is referred to as an advocate for Hindu-Muslim cooperation by certain academics. It is claimed that only because of Jinnah's efforts did the Muslim League and the Congress begin holding joint meetings. This was done primarily to encourage involvement and mutual dialogue. In 1915, Bombay was the location of the sessions of the Muslim League and Congress. They got together again in Lucknow in 1916, the same year that the infamous Poona Pact was signed. Both groups agreed on constitutional reform as per the conditions of the pact, and it became their united demand from the British government. Under British control, when Muslims had a distinct electorate, Congress was opposed.
By 1919, politics in India had begun to change. This was mostly due to Mahatma Gandhi holding a prominent role. Gandhi supported the khilafat movement, which pleased Muslims. Gandhiji sought the whole populace's support for his nonviolent non-cooperation movement. This blending of politics and religion did not sit well with Jinnah. His guiding principle was that politics and religion should not coexist. Gandhiji's action made Jinnah feel uneasy. Jinnah criticized Gandhi in the open. He did not endorse Gandhi's non-cooperation movement. He was of the view that this movement would lead to complete disorganization and chaos. Hindu revivalist movements that sparked animosity and rioting between Hindus and Muslims evolved after the non-cooperation movement's failure.
Jinnah wished to bring together the different Muslim leaders who had split apart inside the Muslim League. Mohammad Ali Jinnah's endeavor was largely successful. By 1935, a large number of Muslim leaders had both rejoined Muslim League and left the Indian National Congress. It might be claimed that 1937 marked the beginning of the true hostility and conflict between Hindus and Muslims. It became abundantly obvious in 1937 that neither the Muslim League nor the Indian National Congress were prepared to work with each other's. In places with a mix of religions, the Indian National Congress immediately rejects to work with the Muslim League.
It is undeniable that Mohammad Ali Jinnah played a significant influence in the division of India and Pakistan. Here, the British adopted a divide and rule strategy to take advantage of our vulnerability. This is seen in the Government of India Act of 1909. The Calcutta riots and the Lucknow Pact were other factors. Since Gandhi ji was the one who combined politics and religion in the Khilafat movement, which Jinnah did not like, Gandhi ji cannot be considered to be solely responsible for division. The fundamental cause of this is also the conflict between Nehru and Jinnah over gaining political power. Jinnah was not the only person responsible for the division.