Police Reforms in India | 03 Dec 2025

For Prelims: Police, Status of Policing in India Report, 2025JanamaithriHuman Rights, Supreme CourtNATGRIDCitizens’ ChartersPrakash Singh Directives.   

For Mains: Primary Challenges Facing Police Forces in India, Key Recommendations for Police Reforms, Strategies Needed to Improve the Effectiveness of Policing in India. 

Source: IE 

Why in News? 

At the 60th All India Conference of Director Generals/Inspector Generals of police in Raipur, held on the theme ‘Viksit Bharat: Security Dimensions’, the Prime Minister stressed the urgent need to improve public perception of the police by enhancing their professionalismsensitivity, and responsiveness. 

What are the Major Challenges Facing Police Forces in India? 

  • Colonial Legacy of the Police Act of 1861: The police system still operates under the shadow of archaic colonial law that leads to frequent excessive use of force, especially including tear gasrubber bullets, and baton charges 
  • Public Perception and Trust Deficit: Many marginalized communities, such as DalitsAdivasis, and minorities, fear the police due to historical discrimination and brutality 
    • This erosion of trust weakens community intelligence and crime prevention, making successful outreach models like Janamaithri (Kerala) and Mohalla Committees (Maharashtra) rare exceptions rather than the norm. 
  • Excessive Police Workload:  India faces a major police personnel shortage, resulting in excessive workloads and weakened law enforcement.  
    • Against the UN norm of 222 officers per 100,000 people, India has only 154.84, far below global standards. 
    • About 24% of officers work over 16 hours daily44% work over 12 hours, and the average workday is 14 hours 
      • Many also handle multiple duties—including law enforcement and election work—without adequate rest or fair compensation. 
  • Poor Infrastructure and Technology: Many police personnel lack adequate training in modern investigationforensics, and cybercrime, leading to poor investigationswrongful arrests, and growing case backlogs. 
    • This problem is compounded by a severe shortage of forensic scientists—India has only 0.33 per 100,000 people, compared to 20 to 50 in many foreign countries. 
  • Political Interference: The political executive’s control over transferssuspensions, and promotions undermines police operational autonomy, leading to partisan use rather than impartial law enforcement.
    • 2019 study found that 72% of police officers faced political pressure while investigating cases involving influential persons. 

Police_Reforms

What are the Key Committee/Commission Related to Police Reforms in India?

Committee/Commission/Judgement 

Key Reforms Proposed 

Gore Committee (1971) 

Shift towards professional, service-oriented policing. Emphasized human rights and ethics in training. 

National Police Commission (NPC) (1977-1981) 

Separate investigation from law and order, ensure fixed tenures for senior officers and draft a new Model Police Act to replace the 1861 Act. 

Ribeiro Committee (1998) and Padmanabhaiah Committee (2000) 

Reinforced earlier recommendations, advocating for independent oversight bodies, modern training, and community policing. 

Malimath Committee (2003) 

Strengthen forensic and investigative capabilities, create a Central Law Enforcement Agency for federal crimes and proposed a witness protection program. 

Supreme Court (Prakash Singh Judgment) (2006) 

Issued 7 Directives: 

  1. Constitute a State Security Commission 
  2. Fixed two-year tenure for DGP 
  3. Two-year term for SPs & SHOs 
  4. Separate Investigation and L&O functions 
  5. Set up Police Establishment Board 
  6. Set up Police Complaints Authorities at State & Dist levels 

Set up National Security Commission at Centre level 

Model Police Act (2006) and NHRC Recommendations (2021) 

Emphasize police autonomy, accountability, and regulation of surveillance. 

Smart Policing Initiative (2015) 

Leverage technology, AI, and data analytics for predictive policing. Focus on community engagement. 

Modernisation of Police Forces (MPF) Scheme  

Upgrade weaponry, communication, forensic labs, and cybercrime infrastructure. 

What Reforms are Needed to Improve the Effectiveness of Policing in India? 

  • Implement Court Directives Fully: Enforce fully the Supreme Court’s 7 Directives (2006) by creating independent State Security Commissions (SSC) with majority non-political members to set policy and prevent misuse.  
    • Establish effective Police Complaints Authorities (PCA) at state and district levels with statutory powers to investigate misconduct independently. 
  • Strengthen Internal Accountability: Empower the Police Establishment Boards (for transfers/postings) and introduce performance audits based on objective metrics like public satisfactioncrime prevention, and investigation quality—not just crime rates. 
  • Functional Specialization: Separate the Investigation wing from Law & Order at all police stations to enable specialized detectives and improve conviction ratesUpgrade cybercrime units and forensic labs nationwide, and implement a nationwide NATGRID to connect security agencies’ databases for counter-terrorism. 
  • Institutionalize Community Policing: Establish structured police-public partnerships for collaborative problem-solving, intelligence gathering, and building trust with marginalized communities 
    • Adopt a Police-as-Service model with Citizens’ Charters and social media to ensure service standards and transparent grievance redressal. 
  • Addressing New-Age Challenges: As per Padmanabhaiah Committee recommendations: 
    • Create specialized units for financial fraudcyberterrorismorganized crime, and narcotics with pan-India coordination, and  
    • Ensure inter-agency data-sharing and joint operation protocols among state policecentral agencies, and intelligence bureaus. 

Conclusion 

Police reform in India requires moving beyond colonial structures. Full implementation of the Supreme Court's Prakash Singh directivesfunctional autonomytechnological modernization, and a shift to community-oriented service are essential to transform policing into a professionalaccountable, and trusted institution for a "Viksit Bharat." 

Drishti Mains Question:

Q. Discuss the impact of the colonial Police Act of 1861 on contemporary policing in India. What key judicial directives aim to address this legacy?

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) 

Q. What is the significance of the Supreme Court's Prakash Singh judgement (2006) for police reforms? 
It issued seven binding directives, including creating State Security Commissions and Police Complaints Authorities, to ensure police autonomy, accountability, and reduce political interference. 

Q. How does the police personnel shortage in India compare to global standards? 
India has about 155 police officers per 100,000 people, which is significantly below the UN-recommended standard of 222, leading to overburdening and weakened law enforcement. 

Q. Which committees influenced modern police reforms in India? 
Key committees include Gore Committee (1971), National Police Commission (1977–1981), Ribeiro (1998), Padmanabhaiah (2000), and Malimath (2002–03). 

Summary 

  • India's police remain bound by the colonial 1861 Act, enabling political interference and eroding autonomy.  
  • Severe understaffing and outdated infrastructure cripple investigations and overburden personnel.  
  • This, alongside historical bias, fosters deep public distrust, especially among marginalized communities.  
  • Crucially, Supreme Court directives like the Prakash Singh reforms(2006) remain unimplemented.  
  • Effective transformation requires modern technology, specialized units, and a shift to a service-oriented, community-policing model. 

UPSC Civil Services Examination, Previous Year Question (PYQ)  

Mains

Q.1 Instances of the President’s delay in commuting death sentences have come under public debate as a denial of justice. Should there be a time specified for the President to accept/reject such petitions? Analyse. (2014) 

Q.2 The National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) in India can be most effective when its tasks are adequately supported by other mechanisms that ensure the accountability of a government. In light of the above observation assess the role of NHRC as an effective complement to the judiciary and other institutions in promoting and protecting human rights standards. (2014)