Bank-Centric to Corporate Bond-Based Finance | 19 Feb 2026
For Prelims: Union Budget 2026-27, Corporate Bond, Derivatives, Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs), Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs), Green Corporate Bonds.
For Mains: Reforms introduced to deepen the corporate bond market in the union budget 2026-27, key challenges faced by banks due to shallow corporate bond market penetration, further steps needed to deepen the corporate bond market in India.
Why in News?
The Union Budget 2026-27 has introduced several financial sector reforms aimed at deepening India's corporate bond market and reducing the structural burden on banks.
- These measures implicitly acknowledge that Indian banks are shouldering risks which, in mature economies, are absorbed and distributed by well-developed financial markets.
Summary
- Budget 2026 introduces market-making, derivatives, and guarantee funds to deepen India's shallow corporate bond market (15-16% of GDP).
- Banks currently overburdened (carry 60-65% corporate debt) face asset-liability mismatches and have required Rs 3.2 lakh crore recapitalisation since 2017.
- Reforms aim to distribute credit risk to markets, improve liquidity, and unlock CPSE assets via REITs for sustainable infrastructure financing.
What Reforms have been Introduced to Deepen Corporate Bond Market in the Union Budget 2026-27?
- Market-Making Framework: Establishes designated intermediaries to provide continuous two-way quotes (buy and sell) for corporate bonds, supported by improved access to funding and derivatives on bond indices.
- Total-Return Swaps (TRS): Introduces synthetic trading tools allowing investors to gain exposure to a bond's total return (interest plus price changes) without owning the underlying asset, facilitating risk hedging.
- Bond-Index Derivatives: Broadens participation and supports risk management through derivatives on corporate bond indices, contributing to greater fixed-income market depth.
- Infrastructure Risk Guarantee Fund: Provides prudently calibrated partial credit guarantees to lenders during infrastructure project development and construction phases.
- CPSE Asset Monetisation: Accelerates capital recycling by unlocking significant underutilised real estate holdings of Central Public Sector Enterprises (CPSEs) through dedicated Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs).
- De-risking Infrastructure: Strengthens private developer confidence, improves project bankability, and reduces financing hurdles to encourage private participation in high-risk segments.
What are the Key Challenges Faced by Banks due to Shallow Corporate Bond Market Penetration?
- Structural Overburden of Risk: Banks are forced to act as the default warehouse for credit risk due to the absence of a deep corporate bond market, carrying roughly 60-65% of all non-financial corporate debt compared to 30% in the US.
- Extreme Asset-Liability Mismatch: Banks are expected to finance long-gestation infrastructure projects (highways, power plants) using short-term deposits, increasing systemic vulnerability to shocks.
- Recurring Fiscal Dependency: The accumulation of private-sector credit losses has necessitated massive public recapitalisations (over Rs 3.2 lakh crore since 2017), effectively transferring private losses onto the public balance sheet.
- Constrained Lending Capacity (Opportunity Cost): Capital tied up in long-term corporate loans reduces the availability of funds for productive sectors like small and medium enterprises (SMEs), exporters, and first-time borrowers, even after capital clean-ups.
- Impaired Monetary Policy Transmission: Burdened by long-term credit exposures, banks are reluctant to adjust rates smoothly—hesitating to pass on higher costs or constrained from fresh lending when rates fall—distorting the transmission of policy signals.
Status of Corporate Bond Market in India
- Impressive Growth Trajectory: India's corporate bond market has witnessed significant expansion, growing from Rs 17.5 trillion in FY2015 to Rs 53.6 trillion in FY2025 at a CAGR of approximately 12%, signalling a gradual shift in corporate financing patterns.
- Shallow by International Standards: Despite growth, the market stands at only 15-16% of GDP, lagging far behind economies such as the United States (over 80%), South Korea (79%), Germany (55-60%), Malaysia (54%), and China (45-50%).
- Concentrated Issuance Structure: The market is dominated by private placements (98% of issuances) and top-rated (AAA/AA) borrowers, reflecting limited depth and risk diversification.
- Narrow Participation Base: Participation from critical segments remains minimal—retail investors account for less than 2%, and foreign portfolio investors also have a limited presence, while MSMEs remain largely excluded from bond market access.
- Severe Liquidity Constraints: The secondary market suffers from a low annual turnover ratio (0.3) due to a "buy-and-hold" approach adopted by institutional investors such as insurance companies and pension funds, hampering price discovery and market efficiency.
- Future Potential: India's corporate bond market has the potential to exceed Rs 100–120 trillion by 2030, emerging as a critical pillar of financial stability and economic growth.
What Steps are Further Needed to Deepen Corporate Bond Market in India?
- Create a Corporate Bond Repo Market: Establish a dedicated, centrally cleared repo market for corporate bonds, allowing holders to borrow against their bond portfolios. This would transform corporate bonds from "buy-and-hold" instruments into active collateral, dramatically improving liquidity and enabling leveraged trading strategies.
- Introduce "Greenium" Incentives for ESG Bonds: Offer regulatory incentives such as lower listing fees, faster approval pathways, or lower reserve requirements for banks investing in certified green corporate bonds. This would tap into global ESG demand and create a differentiated, liquid green corporate bond segment.
- Mandate "Bond-Only" Project Finance for Infrastructure: Gradually mandate that a fixed percentage (e.g., 20-30%) of new infrastructure project financing must be raised through public bond issuances rather than bank loans. This would force issuers to create market-disciplined, rated, and tradable instruments from the project's inception.
- Launch a "Corporate Bond Credit Default Swap (CDS)" Index: This would allow investors to hedge broad market risk or take views on the corporate credit cycle without picking individual bonds, attracting a new class of macro-oriented investors.
- Create Retail-Focused "Corporate Bond Savings Certificates": Design a simple, low-denomination corporate bond product with tax benefits (similar to tax-saving fixed deposits) but linked to a diversified pool of highly-rated corporates. This would directly channel household savings into corporate debt while creating retail demand pull.
Conclusion
Budget 2026 marks a critical shift toward addressing India's over-reliance on banks for long-term finance. By deepening the corporate bond market through innovative financial instruments and risk-sharing mechanisms, these reforms aim to build a more resilient financial architecture. Success will depend on sustained implementation and broadening participation across retail investors and foreign investors.
|
Drishti Mains Question: Q. “India’s financial system remains structurally bank-centric.” Examine the challenges faced by banks arising from shallow corporate bond markets. |
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
1. What is the current size of India's corporate bond market?
India's corporate bond market has grown from Rs 17.5 trillion in FY2015 to Rs 53.6 trillion in FY2025, growing at approximately 12% CAGR.
2. How does India's corporate bond market depth compare internationally?
At 15-16% of GDP, India's market is significantly shallower than the US (over 80%), South Korea (79%), Germany (55-60%), and China (45-50%).
3. What are the key reforms introduced in Budget 2026 for corporate bonds?
Key reforms include Market-Making Framework, Total-Return Swaps, Bond-Index Derivatives, Infrastructure Risk Guarantee Fund, and CPSE Asset Monetisation through REITs.
UPSC Civil Services Examination, Previous Year Questions (PYQs)
Prelims
Q. Consider the following statements: (2018)
- Capital Adequacy Ratio (CAR) is the amount that banks have to maintain in the form of their own funds to offset any loss that banks incur if the account-holders fail to repay dues.
- CAR is decided by each individual bank.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
(a) 1 only
(b) 2 only
(c) Both 1 and 2
(d) Neither 1 nor 2
Ans: (a)
Q. ‘Basel III Accord’ or simply ‘Basel III’, often seen in the news, seeks to (2015)
(a) develop national strategies for the conservation and sustainable use of biological diversity
(b) improve banking sector’s ability to deal with financial and economic stress and improve risk management
(c) reduce the greenhouse gas emissions but places a heavier burden on developed countries
(d) transfer technology from developed countries to poor countries to enable them to replace the use of chlorofluorocarbons in refrigeration with harmless chemicals
Ans: (b)
Mains
Q. Do you agree with the view that steady GDP growth and low inflation have left the Indian economy in good shape? Give reasons in support of your arguments? (2019)